Files
cubelinux-kernel/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+fencewmbonceonce+fencermbonceonce.litmus
T
Greg Kroah-Hartman 598cf27219 Linux 6.19.3
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260217200002.683975158@linuxfoundation.org
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Tested-by: Takeshi Ogasawara <takeshi.ogasawara@futuring-girl.com>
Tested-by: Peter Schneider <pschneider1968@googlemail.com>
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Tested-by: Brett A C Sheffield <bacs@librecast.net>
Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Luna Jernberg <droidbittin@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Ronald Warsow <rwarsow@gmx.de>
Tested-by: Justin M. Forbes <jforbes@fedoraproject.org>
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
Tested-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2026-02-19 16:33:27 +01:00

31 lines
545 B
Plaintext

C MP+fencewmbonceonce+fencermbonceonce
(*
* Result: Never
*
* This litmus test demonstrates that smp_wmb() and smp_rmb() provide
* sufficient ordering for the message-passing pattern. However, it
* is usually better to use smp_store_release() and smp_load_acquire().
*)
{}
P0(int *buf, int *flag) // Producer
{
WRITE_ONCE(*buf, 1);
smp_wmb();
WRITE_ONCE(*flag, 1);
}
P1(int *buf, int *flag) // Consumer
{
int r0;
int r1;
r0 = READ_ONCE(*flag);
smp_rmb();
r1 = READ_ONCE(*buf);
}
exists (1:r0=1 /\ 1:r1=0) (* Bad outcome. *)