Files
cubelinux-kernel/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polocks.litmus
T
Greg Kroah-Hartman 598cf27219 Linux 6.19.3
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260217200002.683975158@linuxfoundation.org
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Tested-by: Takeshi Ogasawara <takeshi.ogasawara@futuring-girl.com>
Tested-by: Peter Schneider <pschneider1968@googlemail.com>
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Tested-by: Brett A C Sheffield <bacs@librecast.net>
Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Luna Jernberg <droidbittin@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Ronald Warsow <rwarsow@gmx.de>
Tested-by: Justin M. Forbes <jforbes@fedoraproject.org>
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
Tested-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2026-02-19 16:33:27 +01:00

36 lines
825 B
Plaintext

C MP+polocks
(*
* Result: Never
*
* This litmus test demonstrates how lock acquisitions and releases can
* stand in for smp_load_acquire() and smp_store_release(), respectively.
* In other words, when holding a given lock (or indeed after releasing a
* given lock), a CPU is not only guaranteed to see the accesses that other
* CPUs made while previously holding that lock, it is also guaranteed
* to see all prior accesses by those other CPUs.
*)
{}
P0(int *buf, int *flag, spinlock_t *mylock) // Producer
{
WRITE_ONCE(*buf, 1);
spin_lock(mylock);
WRITE_ONCE(*flag, 1);
spin_unlock(mylock);
}
P1(int *buf, int *flag, spinlock_t *mylock) // Consumer
{
int r0;
int r1;
spin_lock(mylock);
r0 = READ_ONCE(*flag);
spin_unlock(mylock);
r1 = READ_ONCE(*buf);
}
exists (1:r0=1 /\ 1:r1=0) (* Bad outcome. *)