Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260217200002.683975158@linuxfoundation.org Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com> Tested-by: Takeshi Ogasawara <takeshi.ogasawara@futuring-girl.com> Tested-by: Peter Schneider <pschneider1968@googlemail.com> Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> Tested-by: Brett A C Sheffield <bacs@librecast.net> Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Tested-by: Luna Jernberg <droidbittin@gmail.com> Tested-by: Ronald Warsow <rwarsow@gmx.de> Tested-by: Justin M. Forbes <jforbes@fedoraproject.org> Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net> Tested-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
18 lines
759 B
ReStructuredText
18 lines
759 B
ReStructuredText
=================================
|
|
Linux Security Module Development
|
|
=================================
|
|
|
|
Based on https://lore.kernel.org/r/20071026073721.618b4778@laptopd505.fenrus.org,
|
|
a new LSM is accepted into the kernel when its intent (a description of
|
|
what it tries to protect against and in what cases one would expect to
|
|
use it) has been appropriately documented in ``Documentation/admin-guide/LSM/``.
|
|
This allows an LSM's code to be easily compared to its goals, and so
|
|
that end users and distros can make a more informed decision about which
|
|
LSMs suit their requirements.
|
|
|
|
For extensive documentation on the available LSM hook interfaces, please
|
|
see ``security/security.c`` and associated structures:
|
|
|
|
.. kernel-doc:: security/security.c
|
|
:export:
|